James Hamblin, writing for The Atlantic:
In 2010, journalist and caffeine aficionado Murray Carpenter visited the Keurig facilities in Waterbury, Vermont, reporting for The New York Times that the K-Cup idea posed environmental concerns, as the pods were not recyclable or biodegradable. It was that same year that the Keurig model seemed to take off, doubling in sales. In a 2011 local-boys-make-it-big story in the Boston Globe magazine, Eric Anderson, a professor of marketing at Northwestern University, likewise noted that the coffee machines could invite significant backlash because they “generate a ton of plastic waste.”
At the time of Carpenter’s visit, Keurig was on pace to sell three million K-Cups. So to say that growth has been good since then is understatement; last year they topped 9 billion. But today the cups are still not recyclable or biodegradable.
Unfortunately, convenience and waste tend to be positively correlated. Disposable diapers, plastic water bottles, and increasingly single-serving beverages.
German-born physicist Albert Einstein:
It’s not that I’m so smart, it’s just that I stay with problems longer.
Casey Johnston writing for Ars Technica:
The public life-cycle of a Kickstarter rarely ends in tragedy. Often, if a Kickstarter manages to get covered by the media before its funding round end, or even starts, it can meet its goal within days, and superfluous funds continue to roll in over the next few weeks. By the time its crowdfunding stage closes, the creators, backers, and media alike are excited and proud to have ushered this new project so quickly to a place of prosperity, eager for it to continue to grow.
Plenty of projects manage to deliver the goods, even if the timeline slides a bit. That was the case with Tim Schafer’s Kickstarter game Broken Age. If creators miss deadlines, backers typically continue to receive updates via e-mail and the Kickstarter page. But sometimes the end of funding is the beginning of a slide into radio silence, which ultimately turns into few or no backer orders fulfilled, and no satisfactory explanation for why the project didn’t pan out according to the orderly delivery schedule the creators promised.
If you use a keyboard that’s not designed specifically for Macs, you probably are familiar with the annoying mapping of the Home and End keys: they scroll to the beginning or end of an entire document, with no regard to the cursor’s location.
Fortunately it’s an easy fix.
After purchasing a new Mac, this was one of the first tweaks I made.
Steven Levy, republishing a piece he originally wrote for the November 1984 issue of Harper’s:
The problem with ledger sheets was that if one monthly expense went up or down, everything – everything – had to be recalculated. It was a tedious task, and few people who earned their MBAs at Harvard expected to work with spreadsheets very much. Making spreadsheets, however necessary, was a dull chore best left to accountants, junior analysts, or secretaries. As for sophisticated “modeling” tasks – which, among other things, enable executives to project costs for their companies – these tasks could be done only on big mainframe computers by the data-processing people who worked for the companies Harvard MBAs managed.
Bricklin knew all this, but he also knew that spreadsheets were needed for the exercise; he wanted an easier way to do them. It occurred to him: why not create the spreadsheets on a microcomputer?
I can’t think of another invention that has done more for office worker productivity in the last half-century. With a few key presses, I can accomplish in a matter of minutes what would take an entire department weeks to accomplish in the late 1970s. And yet, it’s quite amazing how little the ‘electronic spreadsheet’ has changed over the years, with the main interface – a simple grid of rows and columns – essentially unchanged.
(Via Planet Money)
Sean Fine, reporting for The Globe and Mail:
Canadian adults in grievous, unending pain have a right to end their life with a doctor’s help, the Supreme Court ruled on Friday.
The unanimous ruling, by establishing that the “sanctity of life” also includes the “passage into death,” extends constitutional rights into a new realm. The courts have used the 1982 Charter of Rights to establish gay marriage and to strike down a federal abortion law. The new ruling will change the way some Canadians are permitted to die.
I could express my reasons for supporting doctor-assisted suicide, but I think the opening paragraph of Court’s ruling says it best:
It is a crime in Canada to assist another person in ending her own life. As a result, people who are grievously and irremediably ill cannot seek a physician’s assistance in dying and may be condemned to a life of severe and intolerable suffering. A person facing this prospect has two options: she can take her own life prematurely, often by violent or dangerous means, or she can suffer until she dies from natural causes. The choice is cruel.
Christopher Breen, writing for Macworld:
Last June, Apple announced that it would stop development of its Aperture and iPhoto apps and offer a single photo app in their place—Photos for OS X. Today, developers are getting their first glimpse of Photos, as it’s bundled with the beta version of OS X 10.10.3.
Providing many of the features found in its mobile sibling, the Yosemite-only Photos for OS X offers an interface less cluttered than iPhoto, improved navigation, simpler yet more powerful editing tools, the ability to sync all your images to iCloud (though it doesn’t require you to), and new options for creating books, cards, slideshows, calendars, and prints. I’ve had the opportunity to take an early look at Photos, and this is what I’ve found.
There are several early reviews of Photos for OS X but I found this one the most detailed and informative. Sounds like Photos will be a decent upgrade for those migrating from iPhoto but will certainly be a step down for Aperture users. It isn’t nearly as bad as I feared, nor is it anywhere near what I hoped for. Ideally some additional features – geotagging, star ratings, and stacks to name a few – will find their way into the app before it officially launches. I’d also like to hear that extensions – third-party add-ons available for the iOS version of Photos – will also be available on the Mac.
Apple has released OS X 10.10.2, the second major update to Yosemite.
As was done for prior versions of the operating system, I’ve released a new version of Delete2Archive that is compatible with the latest update. Follow the installation instructions and download the new version of the plugin from the Delete2Archive page.
Chris Coyne explains why there can be no compromise on end-to-end encryption:
This week, the Washington Post’s editorial board, in a widely circulated call for “compromise” on encryption, proposed that while our data should be off-limits to hackers and other bad actors, “perhaps Apple and Google could invent a kind of secure golden key” so that the good guys could get to it if necessary.
This theoretical “secure golden key” would protect privacy while allowing privileged access in cases of legal or state-security emergency. Kidnappers and terrorists are exposed, and the rest of us are safe. Sounds nice. But this proposal is nonsense, and, given the sensitivity of the issue, highly dangerous. Here’s why.
A great explanation of why it doesn’t make sense to give trusted entities the ability to intercept encrypted communications. Too bad the U.K. Prime Minister and his advisors didn’t read this prior to announcing new anti-terror policies.
Andrew Griffin, reporting for The Independent earlier this month:
David Cameron could block WhatsApp and Snapchat if he wins the next election, as part of his plans for new surveillance powers announced in the wake of the shootings in Paris.
The Prime Minister said today that he would stop the use of methods of communication that cannot be read by the security services even if they have a warrant. But that could include popular chat and social apps that encrypt their data, such as WhatsApp.
Apple’s iMessage and FaceTime also encrypt their data, and could fall under the ban along with other encrypted chat apps like Telegram.
The British Prime Minister proposes a system where trusted entities gain the ability to intercept communications when they have a legal reason to do so. In theory this sounds rational, especially when compared to the alternative – violent crimes like the events that took place in Paris.
Realistically, such a policy is terrible:
- Who decides which trusted entities have access to your communications?
- What happens if an untrusted entity gains access to your information through a hack or by exploiting a software bug?
- How can you be assured that the trusted entities won’t abuse their power?
- And what’s stopping bad actors from simply creating their own private applications with full end-to-end encryption?
A knee-jerk legislative reaction to tragic events could unfortunately lead to controversy and regrets.
(Via Daring Fireball)